Inside the Product
See the Readers in Action
Real screens from the free Samoa CaseBase reader — search for a case, then open the full judgment. No account needed.
Compare cases side by side, trace how a principle developed, check a citation, or cross-reference an Act with the decisions that interpret it — twelve practical use cases for lawyers and law students, with examples from real decisions.
Choose the public readers for quick look-ups, the legal AI chatbots for conversational research, or the full workspace when your own documents are involved
No account needed. Search Samoa CaseBase by citation, judge, counsel, court, year, or keyword and read full judgments — and search LegislationBase by Act title, section, part, or status.
Ask Legislation AI about Samoa's Acts and regulations, or Case Law AI about published judgments. Answers reference the exact sections and cases, follow-up questions dig deeper, and sessions are saved so your research builds over time.
Research alongside your own documents: upload up to 23 file types, compare drafts with case law, get writing feedback, and generate citations in five academic styles — all in one place.
Real screens from the free Samoa CaseBase reader — search for a case, then open the full judgment. No account needed.
Practical research methods you can run today — with references you can verify in the full text
Ask Case Law AI to compare how different decisions treated the same issue — or how a later judgment treated an earlier one. Every answer cites the cases it drew on, so you can read each full text and check the reasoning yourself.
Follow an issue through the years — ask how the courts have applied an Act or approached a question over time, then open the judgments to see how the position evolved.
Start from a legal question in plain language and let the chatbot surface the decisions that matter — with references you can verify before relying on them.
Know exactly what you need? Use quick searches — citation:"[2025] WSSC 46" (Police v Tulaga), judge:Lei, party:Police — or filter by court and year, and read the full text instantly.
Move between the statute and the cases applying it: find the exact provisions in LegislationBase, then ask Case Law AI how the courts have interpreted them.
Turn judgments into study notes: ask for the facts, issues, and reasoning in plain language, then generate references in five academic styles for essays and submissions.
Six ways to put Samoa's published decisions to work in day-to-day practice — with examples you can look up in the reader
Open the ruling at first instance and the appellate decision in the same matter, then ask Case Law AI how the two dealt with the issue — a fast way to see what was argued again and how the appeal court responded.
Example: “Compare the Supreme Court's ruling [2025] WSSC 32 with the Court of Appeal decision Malielegaoi & Anor v Speaker of the Legislative Assembly [2025] WSCA 7 — ask how the two decisions differ.”
Break any decision into its working parts — facts, issues, legislation considered, reasoning, and outcome — and pull out the tests the court applied before you rely on it.
Example: “Read Police v VT [2026] WSSC 87 and set out the issues, the legislation considered, and the court's reasoning.”
See how comparable cases were approached — what the court weighed, what was submitted, and the outcome — and check the earlier decisions relied on in the judgment.
Example: “In Police v Kuresa [2025] WSSC 44, what sentence was imposed, and which earlier decisions did the court rely on?”
Follow a decision into later cases: find where it is cited and ask how the later court used it — followed, distinguished, or applied to new facts.
Example: “Open Police v Toma [2026] WSSC 45 and ask how it uses Police v Kuresa [2025] WSSC 44.”
Use quick searches to gather everything a judge, party, or citation touches — then ask about the issues that recur across those decisions.
Example: “Try judge:Lei or party:Ieremia in CaseBase, then ask Case Law AI what issues recur in the results.”
Upload the contract, submission, or report you are working on and research it in the same workspace — compare its clauses or arguments with the published decisions.
Example: “Upload a draft submission, summarise its key arguments with document chat, then check each argument against the case law.”
Six ways to learn from real decisions — from your first case brief to moot preparation
Start with a simple structure — facts, issues, law, reasoning, outcome — and ask for a plain-language explanation of each part. Then read the full text and match it up.
Example: “Summarise Iiga v Tariu & Anor [2025] WSSC 55 in plain language — facts, issues, and outcome.”
Watch a provision being applied in practice: read the section, find a decision that interprets it, and ask how the court worked through the words.
Example: “Read Tuuau v Iona [2025] WSDC 5 and ask how the court worked through section 85(1) of the Electoral Act 2019.”
Build both sides from the authorities: what each party argued, what the court accepted, and what a different argument would need to overcome.
Example: “In Setu v Police [2026] WSCA 4, what did each side argue on appeal, and what did the Court accept?”
Turn your topic list into real cases: for each principle you are revising, find a decision that shows it in action and write your own summary.
Example: “Find a decision under the Narcotics Act 1967 — such as Police v Silipa [2025] WSDC 14 — and explain the offence and what the court had to decide.”
Write summaries that link every statement to the case or section behind it — and turn your notes into references in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, or IEEE.
Example: “After summarising a judgment, generate the reference in APA or MLA style for your assignment.”
Read how a court reached its decision — what it weighed, what it said about the facts, and why the outcome followed. Then compare with another decision on similar ground.
Example: “Read Police v Lia [2025] WSDC 15 and ask how the court approached its decision, step by step.”
Example citations reference real, publicly reported decisions from Samoa's courts — look them up in CaseBase.
From first question to verified answer — an example of how case comparison works in ARLO+
Start in the Case Law AI chat — for example, how different decisions treated the same issue, or how a later judgment dealt with an earlier one.
Every answer lists the cases (and provisions) it used. Open any case in the free CaseBase reader to read the full judgment — no account needed.
Follow up in the same conversation: what turned on the facts, where the approaches differ, and which reasoning later decisions followed.
Your session — questions, answers, and sources — is saved in your workspace so you can return, refine, and build on it later.
Both decisions concern the Speaker's vote on the Constitution Amendment Bill. In Malielegaoi & Anor v Speaker of the Legislative Assembly [2025] WSCA 7 (19 June 2025), the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and discharged the Supreme Court's stay — the Constitutional Amendment Act can come into effect on a date suitable to the government.
Both decisions engage the Constitution of the Independent State of Samoa 1960 (arts. 58 and 109).
Every citation shown is a real decision — open [2025] WSCA 7 in the free reader to verify the answer.
Common questions about researching Samoa's law with ARLO+
Yes. Case Law AI lets you ask comparison questions in plain language — for example how two decisions treated the same issue, or how a later judgment dealt with an earlier one. Answers reference the cases they draw on, and you can open each judgment's full text in the free Samoa CaseBase reader to check the reasoning yourself.
Yes. Samoa CaseBase and LegislationBase are free public readers — search by citation, judge, counsel, court, year, or keyword and read the full texts without signing in. Creating an account adds the Legislation AI and Case Law AI chatbots, saved sessions, document chat, citations, and the writing tools.
Read the provision in the free LegislationBase reader, then ask Case Law AI how the courts have applied it — or ask directly which decisions discuss a particular section. The answer cites the decisions it used so you can read them in full.
Use AI answers as research assistance, not as legal advice. Every answer lists the legislation or judgments behind it — open the referenced full text and check the reasoning before relying on it, the same discipline you would apply to any research tool.
Yes. Open a judgment in the free CaseBase reader and pair it with the Case Law AI chat to ask for its facts, issues, reasoning, and outcome — or compare it with another decision. Answers reference the case text, so you can verify each point against the full judgment before relying on it.
Begin in the free readers, then bring the legal AI chatbots into your research — Legislation AI and Case Law AI are part of the ARLO+ workspace.
Priced in NZD. We accept any Visa, Mastercard, or debit card, including cards issued in Samoa.
Get Started Now